The £1.4 billion ($2.08 billion) Balfour Beatty-led M25 London ringroad financing is officially meant to close in 2008, but the deal will not be out to market until 2009. Four coordinating banks – HSBC, Lloyds, Dexia and Barclays – have been appointed and are guiding a further 15 lenders into the project, as well as the European Investment Bank (EIB).
Banks will struggle with the proposed tenor of 27 years as they grapple with their own funding constraints and many are already calling for a miniperm tranche. But the M25 looks more likely to be a test of the solution to PPP liquidity being proffered by many project arrangers: that EIB and government participation combined with a large number of small-ticket commercial bank participations is enough to close a high-profile deal.
The problem with PPP financings is not project risk. Availability-based PPP deals are among the safest form of project financings (Metronet excluded), with visible income streams and relatively benign penalty regimes. The problem is bank liquidity. This is why banks rejected a proposed contingent guarantee, similar to that provided by Transport for London on the Tube Lines structure, offered by the Highways Agency (HA) for the M25. Lenders would still...
Thank you for printing this article from IJGlobal.
As the leading online publication serving the infrastructure investment market, IJGlobal is read daily by decision-makers within investment banks, international law firms, advisory firms, institutional investors and governments.
If you have been given this article by a subscriber, you can contact us through www.ijonline.com/signup, or call our London office on +44 (0)20 7779 8870 to discuss our subscription options.
Thank you for your interest in using My IJGlobal.
As your firm uses IP recognition, you will need to sign in with your own unique login and password. If you do not have your own login details, please click here to register.
Alternatively, contact the IJGlobal Helpdesk on +44 (0)20 7779 8870 or email Helpdesk on email@example.com.